Field note
From rejected ideas to revolutionary action: the final straw
Published
6 June 2026
8 min read
Growing up in 1980s South Africa gave Scott Rheeder a certain resilience. He was active, drawn to the ocean by age 12, and shaped by time with his grandfather, Gramps, a firm but fair man fluent in English, Afrikaans, and Zulu.
From Gramps, Scott learned hands-on problem-solving, quick wit, and the value of genuine human connection. Those lessons followed him through a career spent fixing broken systems, right up to the point where the systems themselves proved too protected to fix from within.
The villain was the mothership of bureaucracy
The villain was not one person. It was slow-moving bureaucracy, risk-averse gatekeepers, outdated processes, and a culture that rewards conformity over competence.
It showed up in rejected innovations, ignored warnings, wasted talent, and consultants repackaging the ideas of soldiers at painful cost.
In 2017, Scott submitted a defence idea for a quiet, agile electric motorcycle for close target reconnaissance. It had the qualities infantry needed: stealth, agility, and no extra fuel logistics. The idea was dismissed because a Yamaha Grizzly Quad already existed. In 2020, an infantry battalion trialled electric bikes during Exercise Wessex Storm. Scott's query for recognition and the promised incentive went unanswered.
His view of the defence ideas process became blunt: too often, it is where good ideas go to die.
In 2021, as the MOD announced its green policy to replace diesel and petrol vehicles with electric ones, Scott offered practical expertise. He was already converting a scrapped Tesla Model S into his 1956 F100 vintage truck, so he understood the real-world problem. His warning was simple: infrastructure, infrastructure, infrastructure. In 2025, the Army's own absurdities survey listed EV charging infrastructure as the top issue.
The heroes were the people trying to deliver better outcomes
The heroes were soldiers, recruiters, facilities teams, and forward-thinking military personnel trying to deliver better equipment, better estates, sustainable operations, and real productivity. They showed up to serve, but were held back by red tape, poor contractor performance, and a system that favoured the status quo.
Scott was part of those teams, but his strongest value was as the guide who could connect the problem, the people, and the route forward without dressing it up.
The guide work became impossible to ignore
In 2025, as Army Lead for Infrastructure Transition in Directorate Army Recruiting, Scott raised concerns directly with senior Defence Infrastructure Organisation leadership about service family accommodation, mould issues, and poor value from contractors including Pinnacle, VIVO, Mitie, and Vinci.
When told there was no money for improvements, he demonstrated how his process innovation approach had already delivered 76,000 pounds in savings across four minor infrastructure projects.
He then wrote a two-page proposal to the Assistant Chief of the General Staff advocating for a new Department of Military Efficiency. Directed to the Efficiency Portfolio Office, he joined for what became a brief and revealing stint. Within two hours he had submitted findings on how the department could run better. After two full days, he was asked to leave for not conforming.
Scott's exit report was blunt. He argued the office was not a productivity department but a directorate of cuts. He proposed four clear moves.
- +Shut down the Efficiency Portfolio Office.
- +Cancel the FDIS contract.
- +Reduce DIO by 50 percent and empower it with innovative thinkers and doers.
- +Delete consultant contracts and pay military personnel extra to do the same work where they already hold the knowledge.
If the people closest to the work already know the answer, stop paying outsiders to rediscover it slowly.
Voetsek Solutions is born
The final straw was seeing the productivity machine from inside and finding a system more comfortable with cuts than real efficiency. Decades of service had shown Scott that process change was possible. Cyprus, COVID support, War Fighter exercises, and infrastructure transition all proved that good teams can move fast when the route is clear.
Voetsek Solutions was founded on a simple idea: process innovation should serve people, not the other way around. The client team is the hero. Scott is the guide who helps them name the villain, cut the drag, and move with practical urgency.
The Voetsek difference
- +Turn rejected ideas into implemented action.
- +Streamline complex transitions and infrastructure challenges.
- +Replace bureaucratic drag with fast, relationship-driven execution.
- +Create real efficiency without hiding behind excuses.
Meaningful change happens when good people are empowered with better processes. That is the work. Not hero worship. Not theatre. Just clear, direct intervention where the system has stopped moving.
Stop watching good ideas die. Build the route that lets your team act.
